Hi,
updated 1.86 ->> 1.88 and now the RRD graphs are way bigger which leaves me the option to scale the (e.g. qos) page (makes characters hard(er) to read) or having to scroll back and forth within the page to see relevant information (e.g. up and down graphs).
How do I get the old (smaller) sizes back w/o downgrading to 1.86?
What I already tried:
I downloaded /srv/web of 1.86 and 1.88 and did a binary compare. but none of the relevant files seem to have changed, except /srv/web/ipfire/html/themes/ipfire/include/css/style.css but in there not a single “height” changed.
(also @porkyle )
Fine that you like it - I don’t (for the above reasons). So you keep it as it is and I (hopefully!) get back to more information in the same space (I even rather downgrade and stay with 1.86 if there’s no other way).
As written above: I’d have to scale the page down which makes the text/numbers hard(er) to read.
The issue (if I may speak for @ipfrase ) is that prior to the update, we got used to years of the graphs being a certain dimension that we were able to fit at a certain zoom factor. For example, the QoS graphs I can get both up and down graphs to fit on my screen without having to scroll up or down to see both. Suddenly, they are too large to do this. When you scale the web page to, say, 90%, this also scales the fonts down and depending on your situation, the text may no longer be legible due to being too small.
I can live with the change, but I’m curious what prompted it?
On my system with one graph filling a page at 100% mag, the font is larger than on CU187 or CU186, which is what has often been requested on this forum.
IKR!
A waste of screen real estate just to “beautify” a UI. Once more functionality is sacrificed just to satisfy people who cannot focus on the job to do.
But the question remains: How/where can I change the height myself, this parameter must be in some changed files, if others got smaller it must be an individual setting per page.
edit: I’m pretty fine editing files directly (already did so with proxylog.dat and rrdimage.js to adapt to my needs), just needed to know which.
Nice options. Thanks again. Personally, I prefer to leave the watermark. It looks professional and gives them credit if shared in a screenshot. The style.css edit makes a huge difference as well. There is a lot of wasted space at 290px.
