Setting up firewall
iptables v1.8.13 (legacy): owner: Bad value for "--uid-owner" option: "unbound"
Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
iptables v1.8.13 (legacy): owner: Bad value for "--uid-owner" option: "unbound"
Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
...
[1778514171] unbound-control[26944:0] error: connect: Connection refused for 127.0.0.1 port 8953
DNS not functioning...
...
The /etc/passwd and /etc/group files were overwritten by the backup; the new unbound user was deleted.
However a fresh iso install should have had the updated backup.pl and you say it did have so I don’t understand why the unbound user was not re-created unless your restore failed before the addition of the unbound user.
I tried the change by manually adding it to a Core Update system and it worked fine for me both with a restore of a version without the unbound users and then a restore of a version with the unbound user.
The errors you show are nothing to do with the DNS Firewall or unbound.
They are when the University of Toulouse URL Filter lists are restored. If you download the whole list, as url filter does, then some of the entries are symlinks because for example the original advertising list was called publicite and they created a symlink from publicite to ads but if you download the individual lists then they actually have an ads list and a publicite list but the contents are identical.
If you saw my edit, the user unbound was indeed added on my second attempt.
I agree with you about the source of the errors, but:
1 - They should be taken into account (I can’t be the only user on the Toulouse list.).
2 - They shouldn’t prevent the creation of the unbound user (untar exit 1 line 92).
I just checked the backup I restored from in my test and it was from CU199 and it had the Toulouse lists in the backup but no symlinks, only actual directories. So there was a directory for ads and another one for publicite.
Maybe Toulouse started providing the symlinks instead of duplicate directories to minimise the downloads on their server of duplicate material. I don’t know.
No but it didn’t for me.
I will try and compare older backups I have with a new one that I create from CU201 with the latest Toulouse lists.
I don’t understand why you feel the need to make remarks like this!
What I have discovered is that the University of Toulouse decided to change from having duplicate directories for ads/publicite, agressive/agressif, violence/agressif, porn/adult, mail/forums, proxy/redirector and drugs/drogue to having symlinks pointing from the first name to the directory with the second name.
This happened somewhere this year probably sometime after CU199.
So this problem has nothing to do with CU202 but is a bug caused by a change in how the University of Toulouse provide their aggregate list.