# Core 169 testing and change status vulnerability

**URL:** <https://community.ipfire.org/t/core-169-testing-and-change-status-vulnerability/8159>\
**Category:** Security\
**Created:** [29 June 2022 12:34 UTC](https://community.ipfire.org/t/core-169-testing-and-change-status-vulnerability/8159 "2022-06-29T12:34:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![steph78630](https://community.ipfire.org/user_avatar/community.ipfire.org/steph78630/32/8251_2.png) [@steph78630](https://community.ipfire.org/u/steph78630)\
**Post date:** [29 June 2022 12:34 UTC](https://community.ipfire.org/t/core-169-testing-and-change-status-vulnerability/8159/1 "2022-06-29T12:34:52Z")

</div>

Hi,

since the Core 169 testing update, my **Spectre Variant 4** vulnerability ( **CVE-2018-3639** ) moved from “ **Not Affected** ” to “ **Vulnerable** ”…

Anyone see the same change ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ag](https://community.ipfire.org/user_avatar/community.ipfire.org/ag/32/12124_2.png) [@ag](https://community.ipfire.org/u/ag)\
**Post date:** [29 June 2022 14:01 UTC](https://community.ipfire.org/t/core-169-testing-and-change-status-vulnerability/8159/2 "2022-06-29T14:01:00Z")

</div>

I have noticed the same recently. Although the **[spectre-meltdown-checker](https://github.com/speed47/spectre-meltdown-checker)** also now shows the same where before it didn’t.

It might be time for us to upgrade 😂

 ![1](https://community.ipfire.org/uploads/default/original/2X/c/c07b8622b03285748c507901a8992677f7aa440d.png)

spectre-meltdown-checker:

 ![2](https://community.ipfire.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/fa0ba430b4d0b18480e56c1323249495d557be03.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wiztech](https://community.ipfire.org/user_avatar/community.ipfire.org/wiztech/32/16667_2.png) [@wiztech](https://community.ipfire.org/u/wiztech)\
**Post date:** [29 June 2022 14:06 UTC](https://community.ipfire.org/t/core-169-testing-and-change-status-vulnerability/8159/3 "2022-06-29T14:06:54Z")

</div>

Hi,  
My Core169 test box shows Mitigated (same as before).

![spectre](https://community.ipfire.org/uploads/default/original/2X/a/a5c1b8bb7f911b3ae98f9dae7deac8d0940b6dbf.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bonnietwin](https://community.ipfire.org/user_avatar/community.ipfire.org/bonnietwin/32/12350_2.png) [@bonnietwin](https://community.ipfire.org/u/bonnietwin)\
**Post date:** [29 June 2022 14:16 UTC](https://community.ipfire.org/t/core-169-testing-and-change-status-vulnerability/8159/4 "2022-06-29T14:16:55Z")

</div>

spectre-meltdown-checker was upgraded to version 0.45 in Core Update 168.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pmueller](https://community.ipfire.org/user_avatar/community.ipfire.org/pmueller/32/9019_2.png) [@pmueller](https://community.ipfire.org/u/pmueller)\
**Post date:** [29 June 2022 20:38 UTC](https://community.ipfire.org/t/core-169-testing-and-change-status-vulnerability/8159/5 "2022-06-29T20:38:04Z")

</div>

Hi,

if I recall correctly, the `spectre-meltdown-checker` update indeed caused a more accurate reporting of CPU vulnerabilities on my machines. Specifically, one it was actually _not_ vulnerable to has always been reported the other way round before; version 0.45 fixed this.

As for the general sentiment, the output of `spectre-meltdown-checker` appears to be a bit more accurate than the CGI status (which is solely derived from the kernel’s own findings), so it might be useful to cross-check both if in doubt.

There may well be a correction regarding Spectre v4 in the upstream kernel. I did not checked for that, but that particular one is a tricky beast, and it is possible that more CPU models are affected by it than previously assessed.

Brave new world, I guess. 😑

Thanks, and best regards,  
Peter Müller

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xperimental](https://community.ipfire.org/user_avatar/community.ipfire.org/xperimental/32/16702_2.png) [@xperimental](https://community.ipfire.org/u/xperimental)\
**Post date:** [29 June 2022 20:41 UTC](https://community.ipfire.org/t/core-169-testing-and-change-status-vulnerability/8159/6 "2022-06-29T20:41:23Z")

</div>

Yep. I have that status " **Vulnerable**" already in core 168! 👍 So it’s not new.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ag](https://community.ipfire.org/user_avatar/community.ipfire.org/ag/32/12124_2.png) [@ag](https://community.ipfire.org/u/ag)\
**Post date:** [12 July 2022 22:56 UTC](https://community.ipfire.org/t/core-169-testing-and-change-status-vulnerability/8159/7 "2022-07-12T22:56:18Z")

</div>

After upgrading to CU169 stable mitigation is enabled again. I can’t complain 👍

 ![Screenshot from 2022-07-12 23-55-35](https://community.ipfire.org/uploads/default/original/2X/7/70eb63b237c373aaa86283a615ce3d2d22aa79f4.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![steph78630](https://community.ipfire.org/user_avatar/community.ipfire.org/steph78630/32/8251_2.png) [@steph78630](https://community.ipfire.org/u/steph78630)\
**Post date:** [13 July 2022 06:59 UTC](https://community.ipfire.org/t/core-169-testing-and-change-status-vulnerability/8159/8 "2022-07-13T06:59:02Z")

</div>

> [@steph78630](#):
>
> CVE-2018-3639

Same here since CU 169 stable (vulnerable \> not affected)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pmueller](https://community.ipfire.org/user_avatar/community.ipfire.org/pmueller/32/9019_2.png) [@pmueller](https://community.ipfire.org/u/pmueller)\
**Post date:** [13 July 2022 18:57 UTC](https://community.ipfire.org/t/core-169-testing-and-change-status-vulnerability/8159/9 "2022-07-13T18:57:55Z")

</div>

Hi all,

just for the records: You may well see Specte v2 flapping back from “mitigated” to “vulnerable” on your machines.

> **[AMD, Intel chips vulnerable to 'Retbleed' Spectre variant](https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/12/amd_intel_retbleed/)**
>
> Speculative execution side-channels continue to haunt silicon world

Sorry to disappoint, and best regards,  
Peter Müller
